|
What DOES the Bible Say? - An
Overview
The
following article is from Chapter 3 of Pastor, I Am Gay by
the Rev. Howard H. Bess,
pastor of the Church of the Covenant (W&A), Palmer, Alaska
ALL
RIGHTS RESERVED ©
Copyright 1995 Howard H. Bess.
Used by Permission
|
Biblical
authority
|
Back |
All
Christians grant some level of authority to the Old and New
Testament writings. When Christians deal with ethics and morality,
they either start with the Scriptures or at least listen attentively
to their commentary and counsel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developing
a "hermeneutic"
|
|
The
study of the Bible is more than merely reading the material.
Serious study of the Bible involves the adoption of a hermeneutic.
Hermeneutics is the science of literary interpretation. A student's
hermeneutic sets the rules and guidelines to be used in the
study. Conclusions can be no better than the hermeneutic rules
that are adopted.
One basic rule of most hermeneutic systems is "Never ask the
Bible to answer a question that it does not address." Such a
rule should be a truism, yet it is violated over and over again.
For example, the Bible cannot be asked to answer scientific
questions of the 20th Century. The Bible material was written
in pre-scientific eras. It is understandably silent on 20th
Century understanding of chemistry, physics, biology, astronomy,
or geology. My adopted hermeneutic does not allow me to ask
the Bible 20th Century scientific questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Does
the Bible in fact say anything that is applicable to the present
discussion?
|
|
As
we approach the Bible on the subject of homosexuality, we must
ask the root question: " Does the Bible in fact say anything
that is applicable to the present discussion?"
Some facts are accepted by everyone. At the head of the list,
Jesus said nothing on the subject. There is not a single word
in the Gospels, even by inference, about any type of same-sex
sexual activity. Jesus did not hesitate to comment on the evils
of his day. He said nothing about homosexuality. Arguments from
silence are always weak at best. Nevertheless, Jesus's silence
on this particular subject is worthy of note.
Additionally, everyone agrees that there is no word in the original
language of either the Old or New Testament that can be properly
translated homosexual or homosexuality. There is no reference
in the Bible to homosexual orientation. Apparently there is
no known reference in any other extant writings of the eras
of the Biblical writings. One can only conclude that male homosexual
orientation was not a concern to Jesus, to the writers of the
Bible materials, or to the societies in which they lived.
Whenever same-sex references are made in the Bible, it is always
a reference to some particular sexual act.
I do not consider myself a Biblical scholar. I do consider myself
an informed student of the Bible. My congregations have been
dependent upon me to be a capable and conscientious student
of the Scriptures, so that I might in turn give informed interpretations
of the Scriptures to them. When the first member of my congregation
said to me, "Pastor, I am gay," I became a committed student
of the subject. Specifically I became committed to finding out
what the Bible says about homosexuality. |
|
|
|
|
Ten
passages are commonly held to have some relevance to the subject:
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
(Sodom and Gomorrah)
|
|
| Genesis
19 records the story of the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
There is no reference to homosexual activity in the passage.
Two messengers from God, referred to as angels, visited Lot.
Men of Sodom and Gomorrah did not want the messengers from God
in their cities. They demanded Lot turn his guests over to them
for sexual abuse. Lot offered his daughters instead. If the
passage is any commentary about sex, it is about abuse and rape,
not homosexuality. Another rule of hermeneutics is that Scripture
should be allowed to comment on Scripture. Allowing Scripture
to comment on Scripture, the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah were
inhospitable attitude (Luke 10:10-13) and failure to care for
the poor (Ezekiel 16:49-50) |
|
|
|
|
|
Temple
Prostitution
- Deuteronomy
23:17;
- 1
Kings 14:24
- 1
Kings 22:46
- II
Kings 23:7
|
|
| Four
Old Testament passages (Deuteronomy 23:17, I Kings 14:24, I
Kings 22:46, and II Kings 23:7) forbid both male and female
prostitution in pagan temples. The people of God were warned
against selling themselves sexually for pagan religious ceremonies.
A male temple prostitute performed sexual acts with another
male, a clear homosexual act. I would not allow modern heterosexual
prostitution to be used as a negative commentary on the morality
of sexual relations between a loving husband and wife. Neither
do I see any relevance of ancient male temple prostitution to
the discussion of homosexuality and the practice of Christian
faith in the late 20th Century. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Holiness Codes
- Leviticus
18:19-23
- Leviticus
20:10-16
|
|
Two
more of the pertinent passages are from the Old Testament: Leviticus
18:19-23 and Leviticus 20:10-16 are a part of the Holiness Codes.
The theme of the codes is summed up with "You shall be holy,
for I, the Lord your God, am holy." To be holy or pure before
God was something more than merely being moral. Every area of
a person's life was involved. Some instructions in the Holiness
Codes became central to Christian understanding. When Jesus
commanded his followers to love their neighbors, he was quoting
from the Holiness Codes. On the other hand, the Holiness Codes
carry instructions that all Christians ignore. According to
the codes, a worker must be paid his wage on the day of his
labor. A field is never to be harvested to the edge. Two types
of yarn are never to be woven into the same cloth. Raw meat
is not to be eaten. Tattoos are forbidden. Bigamy is clearly
acceptable.
Imbedded in the Holiness Codes along with an almost endless
number of instructions and commands is found a prohibition of
a specific homosexual act. "You shall not lie with a male as
with a woman." The book of Leviticus itself gives us little
help in understanding the intent of the command. Leviticus tells
us nothing specific about the forbidden homosexual act. It gives
us no context for the command. Christian hermeneutics give priority
to the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth over the Old Testament.
Jesus set new standards for what it means to be holy. He embraced
some Old Testament standards. He rejected and openly violated
some other Old Testament standards: his breaking of Sabbath
rules kept him in constant tension with religious leaders. He
ignored some Old Testament standards. He raised justice, mercy,
kindness, and love to new heights.
In the light of Jesus's life and teachings, the two Holiness
Codes passages fade into obscurity and irrelevance. The Old
Testament informs and instructs, but it is the New Testament
and the teachings of Jesus that the Christian churches have
embraced as normative and as having final authority.
It is well for hermeneutics to raise a general caution. Can
any ancient prohibition set in a little known and little understood
context be properly superimposed over a modern setting? In particular
can the Holiness Codes statement have any relevance to the relationship
between two men or two women in the 20th Century in a committed
relationship that is characterized as genuinely affectionate
and respectful? I think not. |
|
|
|
|
|
New
Testament Passages:
- Romans
1:26-2:1;
- I
Corinthians 6:9-11,
- Timothy
1:10
|
|
This
leads us to consider three passages in the New Testament. All
three references about sexual deviance are found in the writings
of Paul. They are Romans 1:26-2:1, I Corinthians 6:9-11, and
I Timothy 1:10. These passages have always been difficult to
translate and even more difficult to interpret because there
are no clear English equivalents into which the key Greek words
can be translated. The most exhaustive study of the issues involved
was published by author Robin Scroggs in his book The New Testament
and Homosexuality published in 1983.
In his study, Scroggs takes us into the Jewish and Greek worlds
of Paul's day. He researched the sexual practices and the issues
of morality of that day as reflected in literature extant from
that day. He found no indication of interest in same-sex sexual
relationships between consenting adults. What he did find was
the widespread practice of pederasty. In its usual form pederasty
was a form of prostitution in which young boys were used sexually
by heterosexual males. Devout Jews and Christians were understandable
critical of this practice found widely among the Greeks. It
is in this context that the words and expressions used by Paul
are found in other literature o the same period.
It is Scroggs' argument that the three references from Paul
which we have cited are not commentaries about homosexuality
in general, but understandable references to the widely known
practice of pederasty among the Greeks. Scroggs confronts us
with another rule of hermeneutics. He maintains that for moral
and ethical passages of the Bible to be applied to today's world,
there must be some reasonable similarity between the contexts
then and now. In this case the contexts are so dissimilar that
the three passages become irrelevant. To make his point even
clearer, Scroggs coccludes that Paul can be shown to be against
only that which he was clearly against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What
Does the
Bible say about homosexuality?
"Not
Much!"
|
|
|
One further
observation is worthy of consideration. Nowhere in the New
Testament is there a discussion of homosexuality or of any
homosexual practice. The three New Testament references are
part of lists made in the larger contexts of other discussions.
Even if the importance of these three passages could be maximized
and be shown to be directly relevant to today's discussion,
the very incidental nature of the references would relegate
them to secondary importance.
When a parishioner asks me what the Bible says about homosexuality,
my most honest answer must be "Not much!"
I have expressed my best studied opinion. But I am no more
than an informed student. I am not a New Testament scholar.
I can ask no one to agree with me because of my standing as
a scholar. I would ask that every pastor and church leader,
who is serious about the issue of homosexuality and the church's
ministry, take the time to sort out the facts, the fiction,
the myths, the mysteries, and find a model of understanding.
It is out of that model of understanding that the strangers
in our midst can become our friends, our brothers and sisters
in Christ.
ALL
RIGHTS RESERVED ©
Copyright 1995 Howard H. Bess.
Used by Permission
|
|
|